Søren Pind blog about freedom perspective in large and small. Stem is a former Development and Integration Minister, el japon Member of Parliament and foreign policy el japon spokesman for the Liberal, cand. Laws and former el japon lecturer el japon in constitutional el japon law at the University of Copenhagen. Søren Pind is also panel list in the popular radio program "Fox and monopoly" on P3. Pin is known for its cash positions and views clearly positioned in the bourgeois-liberal worldview
Berlingske want to ensure that the debate on b.dk kept in a proper tone that makes it inspiring and challenging for everyone to contribute and participate. We are looking for like clear, sharp, attitudinal strong post with great breadth el japon and diversity and critical look at the case. But we do not accept messages that are blatantly libelous, racist, personally demeaning. Such posts will henceforth be deleted. The same applies to posts that do not bear the full and correct name of the sender, which contain abbreviated names, fictitious or false names. We encourage all debaters to make editorial note posts that do not follow these guidelines. The editors.
My parents were in the peace movement. I joined the Young Liberals. They marched el japon against the atomic bomb. I thought they went Soviet errand. el japon My mother once remarked that it might not matter whether it was the Americans or the Russians who came. I shook my head. And one day, on top of the continual discussions, she exclaimed: "We el japon want to do is ha 'peace, dammit ..."
So I have a unique insight into what Carsten Jensen, Nielsen, Frank Aaen and Poul Villaume today tells the newspaper Information: "We are prepared to accept that the Taliban reign of terror el japon returns if the price of pulling the foreign forces ".
There is a straight el japon line from the value relativism that characterized the Cold War, where democracy and dictatorship slid in for those who are considered 'wanted' peace, dammit, "and then to the acceptance of the people of Afghanistan sufferings will multiply, we just have peace.
On the other hand lied to the very same, then with Saddam Hussein. They claimed later that they would not have done the same with him. Nonsense. Had they been, they had also sought peace with him, and left him rule over Iraq. Let the future be the honest-scale debate on the Iraq war. The same forces did it not do so because the ground war was so soon over, and because Hussein as soon as he was caught, was brought to an Iraqi court and sentenced.
The struggle for freedom will always be poisoned by those who put themselves first, and do not care about others. They pack it into the brave words - but it's about a fundamental hatred of Western values and America. A hatred of capitalism and the free choice. So rather dictators and vicious regimes. I say bon appétit. el japon
Luckily my parents were wiser. But Holger K., Frank Aaen and Poul Villaume? I have given up hope. It's el japon not the worst for me. But for the Afghan people - mainly women and children. Read The Kite Runner, and understand ...
Written by Niels B. Larsen 24 August 2010 at. 09:21
Agree! Unbelievable that people can be so stubborn that they will put a fake world order of individuals suffering just to have a particular political standpoint. You can always el japon discuss whether there was more suffering than before now, but at least there will be fighting for something now!
What if you do not hate Western values and freedom of choice, but just think it does not go particularly well in Afghanistan? What if one wonders what is the goal? When can we pull the troops out? If not now, then when?
The war in Iraq had little to do with Saddamages reign of terror, you know very well - your loved ones stable el japon value friends in Washington supported him for many years while he murdered his own people in droves: You're objectively wrong!
The war in Afghanistan we lose because we are not able to win it. What is the goal, after all? Democracy version Karzai? I have to laugh or cry. Our soldier boys dying in Afghanistan because it serves our interests to placate the United States. It is CLEAN realpolitik, and as such worth the price .... or ..?
And let's just deal with all the villains we connive in such countries as Egypt, el japon Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, Chad, Niger, Mali, Mauritania, Guinea, Nigeria, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Zambia, Gabon, Saudi, UAE , Kazakstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan ... Our bad guys may well sit in power, right? For they keep well with the good.
@ NBL: In principle, agree with some of what you say - maybe it's a lost cause in advance. But it's also a little dangerous to just give up. If you can open up the country, to strengthen el japon freedom of movement, the economy and the information, one can well imagine that there is progress. el japon Nobody says it has to be the United States tomorrow after all .. just not the Taliban